Chose 1: Quick, Bishop, Jones
This is for a limited keeper league where I can only protect one goalie. It's 2 points for a win, 1 point for a shootout loss and 2 points for a shutout. So basically, looking for the goalie with the most wins.
I currently own Quick and Bishop. To get Jones, I would need to trade with a downgrade of draft pick.
I have two questions:
1. With this setup, which goalie would you pick between Quick and Bishop?
2. Do you think there will be a big difference between those two and Jones? Dallas got better, L.A. not really but I'm not sure San Jose will that much better. The path is safe for Quick and Jones while Bishop has injuries history and Lehtonen to compete.
Please tell me what you think.
Re: Chose 1: Quick, Bishop, Jones
Bishop: I think DAL wins the most games next year and assuming health, Bishop will start 65 games and win 35+. Plus, last year was his first injury issue - I don't consider him a great risk.
Jones: I trust SJ over LA and Jones is steady Eddy.
Quick: Probably the best talent of the three but not sure what happens in LA next year.
H2H Dynasty, 16 Team Salary: G, A, PPP, SOG, Hits, BKS, SHTOI, W, Sv%, Saves, GA%, (4C, 4RW, 4LW, 6D, 1G)
C: Crosby, Malkin, Larkin, Hartman, McBain, Joshua
RW: Rantanen, Konecny, Strome, Batherson, Zetterland
LW: Buchnevich, Ehlers, Marchessault, Bertuzzi, Acciari
D: McNabb, Ferraro, Hakanpaa, Lyabushkin, Samuelsson, Bernard-Docker, Emberson
G: Merzlikens, Daccord, Samsonov
Prospects: Kurich, Lucius, Pelletier, Cristall, Yurov, Beckman, Brisson, Dean, Phillips, Poitras
Re: Chose 1: Quick, Bishop, Jones
I'm not overly impressed with Quick as a regular season goalie. For me it comes down to Bishop or Jones. How much is the actual cost to acquire Jones? Whatever that is, is it enough to cover the gap of Bishops potential injury? I see Bish as a high risk / high reward guy this year while Jones will be a safer pick to post above league average numbers. Since you don't count saves / goals against, Bishop could be in line for a lot of high scoring wins. Thinking about your league scoring, I'm actually talking myself into recommending Bishop as your best option.
12 Team Weekly H2H, Daily Lineups. Keep 7 + 1 Prospect (<164 NHL games).
Scoring:PLAYER: G(3), A(2), D Pts(addt'l 0.7), +/-(0.5), PPP(addt'l 1), SHP(addt'l 0.5), SOG(0.4), BLK(0.8)GOALIE: W(2), GA(-1.5), Saves(0.3), SO(3)Positions - 3C, 2RW, 2LW, 4D, 2G, 5 Bench, 4 IR, 1 prospect
C - J Hughes(LW), Hintz, Malkin, Pinto
LW - M Tkachuk(RW), Robertson
RW - Rust, Necas, Zuccarello
D - Makar, Fox, Bouchard, Roy, Krug
G - Oettinger, Thompson, Wedgewood
Prospect Keeper - L Hughes(D)
IR - Hill(G)
2024 Picks - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
Re: Chose 1: Quick, Bishop, Jones
If I had to choose one I probably go Jones, Bishop may end up being the best but the risk of injury and Dallas's D is enough to lure me away
14 Team (H2H Points) Dynasty League
C: McDavid, MacKinnon, Eichel, Zibanejad
LW: E.Kane, Panarin, Huberdeau, Marchand, Landeskog
RW: Rantanen, Zuccarello
D: Makar, Dahlin, Chychrun, Drysdale
G: Shesterkin, Saros, Markstrom
Prospects: Carlsson, Raty, Berggren, Miroshnichenko, Othmann, Clarke, Gulyayev, Nikishin, Wallstadt, Wolf
16 Team (H2H Points) Dynasty League
C: MacKinnon, Zibanejad, Duchene, Schenn, Johansen, Monahan, Krebs, Pageau
LW: E.Kane, Pacioretty, Vrana, Hoffman
RW: Tuch, Stone, Wilson, Batherson, Sprong, Gallagher, Wahlstrom
D: Dahlin, Hamilton, Letang, Dumba, Kylington, Liljegren
G: Allen
Prospects: Byfield, Guenther, Rossi, Perreault, Nikishin
Re: Chose 1: Quick, Bishop, Jones
Quick
Jones
Bishop
still have faith in Quick's game. Most talented amongst the 3 thats for sure. How many other goalies make karate like saves?
Re: Chose 1: Quick, Bishop, Jones
As its wins I prefer Quick or Bishop - I'm not sold on San Jose next year right now
Experience is the teacher of all things.
Re: Chose 1: Quick, Bishop, Jones
It's down to Bishop vs Jones, and since it would cost you something to acquire Jones, go with Bishop.
Re: Chose 1: Quick, Bishop, Jones
I fully agree with this statement.Originally Posted by MrSandals
Re: Chose 1: Quick, Bishop, Jones
I third this. Dallas has made some great moves and has put together a strong squad. It looks like they are making a push to develop a team that will make a run for a cup over the next few seasons.
As for Bishop, I think with his big shiny new contract the crease is his. He would have to falter badly for quite a length of time to lose it IMO.
KHL Fantasy Hockey League Keep 8
3-C 3-RW 3-LW 6-D 2-G
Forward 5-G 3-A 1.0 STP
D-Men 6-G 4-A 1.5 STP
.35 Shot .4 Hit .4 Block .1 FOW
Goalie 6.5 Win .25 Save -2.5 GA 2-SO
C- Larkin, Hischer, Horvat, R. Thomas
LW- Stamkos, Hyman, Kreider, Lehkonen,
RW- Laine, Marchessault, Toffoli. Buchnevich
D- Doughty, Burns, Letang, Andersson (IR), Faulk, Toews, Pionk, Petry
G- Vasilevskiy, Copley, Andersen
Re: Chose 1: Quick, Bishop, Jones
Bishop for me, I think he's the only guy there with 40 win upside in their current situations.
Re: Chose 1: Quick, Bishop, Jones
Bishop for me... Dallas will have a big bounce back year!
Re: Chose 1: Quick, Bishop, Jones
Another vote here for Bishop
Re: Chose 1: Quick, Bishop, Jones
I like Jones the most. Good team, good goalie. Quick is a good goalie but I dont know if the team will be good. Dallas are likely to improve, but I think Lehtonen is going to start more than people think.
12 team H2H Most Cats Wins; Keep 6/winner keeps 7; G A PPP +/- SHP SOG HIT BLK PIM // W SV GAA SV% SHO
3 C, 3 LW, 3 RW, 6D, 2G, 5 bench
C - McDavid, Crosby, Tavares
LW - DeBrincat
RW - Meier, Miller
D -
G - Jarry
Re: Chose 1: Quick, Bishop, Jones
Jones... by far the safest bet, comparable if not higher upside than Bishop/Dallas IMO
Re: Chose 1: Quick, Bishop, Jones
I sure hope not for Dallas' sake.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
