Rantanen is not a possible Kucherov. Marner is, if anything. But I'd rather have Gaudreau. I'd push for more in that Skinner deal - he's riding some pretty high value and Giroux at an all-time low. You can do better, believe it or not
I was talkin with a gm and was offered
Marner and Rantanen for Gadreau then after that Giroux for Skinner in separate deals .
I am warry if the first because I'm unsure of marner but love rantanen(next possible kucherov kind)
Do either of these deals jeopardize my chance to repeat? League in signature
10 Team Full Keeper.
Goals:3, Assist:2, PPP/SHP: 1, Hit: .2, Sog: .2 ,Blocks: .2
Win:3, Shutout: 2, Save: .2, GoalAgainst: -1
Forwards: Gadreau, Monohan, Draisaitl,
P.Kane,Pastranek,Panarin,Bergeron,Voracek,Kuznetso v,huberdeau
Defence: Hamilton,Doughty,Josi ,Ghost
Goalies: Bob,Helleybuck,Rittich
Farm: Kratsov,Q.Hughes, Suzucki, Whalstrom, puljarvi
Head to Head points based. Keep 3F,2D,1G
Goals2,Assist1,Gwg1,Hatrick3,ShG1,SGWG1,Pim.2,+/- .5, Ppg1,Shg2
F: Gadreau,Ehlers,Johansen
D:Risto,Parayko
G:Vasilevski
Rantanen is not a possible Kucherov. Marner is, if anything. But I'd rather have Gaudreau. I'd push for more in that Skinner deal - he's riding some pretty high value and Giroux at an all-time low. You can do better, believe it or not
The Best Fantasy Hockey Site
15-Team Keeper, points only, best 12 fwd, 4 dman, 2 G count. Playoffs count.
F - T. Thompson, Thomas, Nylander, Tarasenko, Arvidsson, Guentzel, Fiala, Quinn, Mittelstadt, Hagel, Zacha, Roslovic, Berggren, Brink, Ostlund
G - Kahkonen, Vejmelka, L. Thompson, Levi, Comrie
D - Hronek, Morrissey, Lundkvist, Girard, Brannstrom, Rathbone, Hanifin, Severson, Durzi
I agree with Dobber. Neither deal is bad, but you can do better. Marner is definitely the main piece of the first deal, not Rantanen.
Is it the same GM offering you both deals? If so then maybe you can make it one big deal and get him to add a solid sweetener to make it happen.
Associate Editor for DobberHockey (Wednesdays). Click that Ramblings button on the the menu bar!
(No I don't have a hockey problem...)
I actually prefer the first deal to the second but even then I'm not sure I do it unless I have 0 depth...
Experience is the teacher of all things.
It's hard to imagine getting more for either of them in my league at least. But in my case I do have some depth but it is Bergeron Reinharht fabbri wennberg
If I can keep everyone every year then I would definitely consider deal 1... Out of interest though who are the better players available on waivers?
Experience is the teacher of all things.
Yeah our league is a 10 team full keep 20 roster with the goals being 3 to assist 2. And waiver options off the top of my head would be Coyle,Neideritter, Jordan stall filigno and Nash
Don't overrate Rantanen. Do properly rate Marner (hint - he's superb). Gaudreau is weak in multi-cat, particularly your categories.
DobberHockey Senior Writer (columnist since 2012)
Click here to read my weekly "Roos Lets Loose" columns, going live every Wednesday morning and consisting of a rotating schedule of a "forum buzz" column, a fantasy hockey mailbag, a tournament/poll, and an edition of Goldipucks and the Three Skaters: https://dobberhockey.com/category/ho...key-rick-roos/
Yes it is painful to see a guy like him be less worthy then a guy who will get less points bit idk. Should I then ask for an upgrade on rantanrn ?
Yes it is painful to see a guy like him be less worthy then a guy who will get less points bit idk. Should I then ask for an upgrade on rantanrn ?
I think Rantanen is good enough bit of you think the other GM would upgrade him I may try and add an additional player in to upgrade another of yours but I like the deal as is if there are no drops involved...
Experience is the teacher of all things.