Jenner or mantha

[Cpedersen84]

Who would you take between the 2 in a multicat dynasty, mantha or jenner?

[Mr. Guru]

Mantha

[kevinsrangers]

I've got both in my league. I play jenner more but I see Manthas upside and I think he's going to be the better own.

[Axeman33]

Mantha for me even without knowing all the exact categories.

[Sulla]

Both have appeal but I do prefer Mantha

[FinnishFlash]

Mantha.

I think we've seen Jenners upside. He's useful in multicat leagues but replaceable.

[lucafen4]

Personally, in a perfect world, I prefer Jenner, they're very similar in age, Jenner's going into, technically, his 5th year (even though one was missed due to injuries). Two seasons of 200+ hits & shots with solid PIM dished in with 30g potential makes him very attractive. The downside with Jenner though, is Torts. Was last year just tough love from Torts to get Jenner to play a more complete game and part of the maturation process of him as a player? Or does Torts not think he's top 6 material. IMO, it's the former, tough love for the right reasons. CBJ is deep up front, so his path is really clouded and can easily be bumped down and passed by other players on the depth chart.

Mantha on the other hand has everything sitting there waiting for him to snatch it.

I don't see Jenner ever being more than a 25/30 - 20 guy, whereas Mantha can become that 55-65pt guy and 30+g per year. Some of this likely comes down to preference too, if you need H, SOG (Mantha will increase) PIM, you may lean toward Jenner.

In 3 years, I full expect Mantha's offensive output to be 10pts/yr above Jenners. Jenner is kinda like a E. Kane-lite. There's a case for both, it's really your preference.

[ericdaoust]

Depends on the categories.

[Moses]

Depends on the categories.

^^ SLOW CLAP. That, there folks, is the follow up question.