Marvin or Baldwin

[hockeyrobot]

0.5 PPR

We can start 4 WR total (2 flex) and I already own Cooks, Nelson, Adams, Moncrief and then Marvin Jones.

Worth it just in case Seattle turns it around?

[Bomm Bastic]

I wouldn't. I know Jones hasn't done much lately but neither has Baldwin. Seems like a lateral move for a what amounts to be a bench player for your team.

[PenguinHunter]

I would prefer Baldwin.

Wilson is getting rid of the knee brace... which means he should be more mobile.... which means he is more of threat to run... which means defenders won't be able to sit back... meaning Baldwin should see more free space.

[hockeyrobot]

I would prefer Baldwin.

Wilson is getting rid of the knee brace... which means he should be more mobile.... which means he is more of threat to run... which means defenders won't be able to sit back... meaning Baldwin should see more free space.

I ended up making the deal for Baldwin. Biggest reason being I would have had Moncrief and Jones on bye Week 10...now I only have Moncreif

[2014olympicgold]

With the bye week I like the deal. Otherwise it was a horizontal move. This just gives you more flexibility with your bench which is a big bonus. Lets see how Baldwin does tonight, if he comes up big, great deal for you. If he gets hurt tho

[hockeyrobot]

With the bye week I like the deal. Otherwise it was a horizontal move. This just gives you more flexibility with your bench which is a big bonus. Lets see how Baldwin does tonight, if he comes up big, great deal for you. If he gets hurt tho

Agreed. I was thinking that with my other WR, I probably won't start Jones anyway so why not buy low on Baldwin? Seahawks offense can't get worse can it?

[hockeyrobot]

Lololol I just played the guy that gave me Baldwin.

[2014olympicgold]

Great buy for you, even if you don’t want Baldwin, maybe you can turn and flip him for someone else.

[mwojt21]

Baldwin has some nice matchups ROS, so good trade!