Ekblad vs Werenski

**TigerUpperCut** · October 22, 2016, 5:31 PM

Points only keeper. Who's the best bet long term?

**joe jones** · October 22, 2016, 5:32 PM

ekblad

**kiboshed** · October 22, 2016, 5:34 PM

werenski and its not even close

he's the next gostisbehere

**TigerUpperCut** · October 23, 2016, 2:05 PM

Not even close? Ekblad is no slouch...
Anyone think Ekblad will be the Pietrangelo to Yandle/Matheson's Shattenkirk? Whereas Werenski will be the Shatty to Seth Jones' Petro?
What sort of points are we thinking here? 50v45? 60v50? Just wondering where everyone sees them in a couple years.
Thanks!

**The Bottlenecker** · October 23, 2016, 3:24 PM

I think both of them will plateau around the 50 point mark. Pretty even in my opinion.

**lannymcdonald** · October 23, 2016, 3:55 PM

Werenski but it's close. Think there's a good chance Ekblad's ceiling is lower over the next few years with Yandle ahead of him for the #1 PPQB spot.

**havanablast21** · October 23, 2016, 10:27 PM

Ekblad. I still see him a tier above and on a better team.

**Eskimo Brother** · October 23, 2016, 10:29 PM

I'm going Ekblad because they are close enough that the two years ahead that he has is a big advantage at the moment.

**kevinsrangers** · October 23, 2016, 10:32 PM

I'd vote ekblad as well.

**Instant Karma** · October 23, 2016, 11:10 PM

I'll take Ekblad as well. I like Werenski, though. Just not a large enough sample size for me to take him over Ekblad.

**Zorro** · October 23, 2016, 11:32 PM

I do like Werenski but I would take Ekblad here!!

**ddp** · October 24, 2016, 5:50 PM

I'm not sure if the Ekblad owner offered me him for Werenski if I'd accept or not so yes its close. My final point is that Ekblad has seen less PP time than Demers on certain nights and I believe Mathesons went up last game too. Maybe he's a peiterangelo type....more an all around great DMan than a Pts producer.