G+Jussi or Pac + Larkin??

[BogosianLandeskog]

Ok short term vs long term, what side?

Giroux
J.Jokinen

Or

Pacioretty
Larkin


Stats:

G
A
Pts
Pp pts
+/-
Pims
Shots
Hits
Blocks

[GSD]

I like patches and Larkin

[BogosianLandeskog]

I really want Giroux but not at this cost

[Sulla]

Giroux is the best player, and I'm not a huge Jokinen fan (though he is solid) and Larkin amd Patches are in between.

Personally i I keep what I have. I don't think it's a bad deal I just think the drop off from Giroux to Patches is less than a drop off from Jokinen to Larkin (that and I don't see any re sale value in Jokinen whilst I think Larkin's is high)

[rufio.85]

Because of the shots category and my lack of trust in Jussi Jokinen, I go Patches and Larkin.
Unless this is a league with a very limited number of keepers.

[Eskimo Brother]

Jokinen is irrelevant. If we were looking at this as a 2 for 1, we would see Larkin as the cost to upgrade from Patches to Giroux, and say it's almost worth it. Then you add in whatever replacement value you can get from the spot (a FA, and likely not Jokinen) and we would say yes to the Giroux side. Sometimes the phrasing can even change our opinions.

[FinnishFlash]

I'd take the Giroux side, he is the best player in the deal.

Larkin has nice upside, but I'd want a better piece than that to downgrade from Giroux to Patches.