Poolie needs goalies badly!

[lord.numskull]

See sig for details, but despite some trade offers I will have to enter the draft with no goalies. I pick at #6 and #13, which should hopefully have a few options available:
eg. Murray, Elliott, Anderson, Mason, Halak/Greiss, Pavelec/Hellebuyck, Miller/Markstrom

Am I foolish for not keeping Halak, thus freeing #6 to get, say, Murray and then 13 on a more stable starter? Which goalie(s) would you try to target in your first 2 picks?

I may look at trading Parayko or Vatanen for Elliott.. sane move? Defencemen that score and have a good +/- are gold in our league.. by far the biggest point swing, besides 60+ start goalies vs tandems.

Thanks,
Travis

[Eskimo Brother]

I'm assuming you start two goalies?
Anyways, with your setup, having D with good +/- would seem to be a bit of a cheat code. I would try to draft Elliott/Anderson with 13, after going BPA at 6. You can then either value draft your next goalie(s) or make a trade. You do have the right 10 keepers lined up though.

[chuckcouples]

Not keeping Halak seems like a smart move. I would be targeting Anderson with a draft pick. He should get the most starts out of the goalies listed.

I would also be keeping RNH over both Vatanen and Galchenyuk.

[Sulla]

Personally I wouldn't run the risk and I would take a goalie at 6 (if Elliott is there he would be my choice). If you miss at 6 and then take Murray at 13 that might end your championship hopes there and then

[The Bottlenecker]

Elliott will get lots of quality starts for you so you should get him ASAP. If he is gone, then Anderson would be my next choice.

[stevegamer]

I think a potential deal of Parakyo for Elliott would be a solid move, but otherwise going into the draft with no goalies is okay.

[lord.numskull]

Started another thread in the trade forum, but I managed to trade Ghost+Parayko for Hall+Elliott+Yandle

[Sulla]

I'd be happy with that if you are in it to win it