Re: Allen or Talbot
Originally Posted by
tobias
I don't think you'll find anyone making either of those arguments.
But I agree with most of the rest of what you said. St. Louis is much better than Edmonton, and until Edmonton turns the corner (see it to believe it, exactly as you said!), I wouldn't trust Talbot for W or SHO. I'd take Allen, but make sure that I have a strong #3 goaltender, for when he inevitably get injured and/or goes through a rough patch.
I'm with Tobias. It is Allen, but he's not a top 5 goalie. He's also injured enough that you need Hutton at minimum, or another starter.
Associate Editor for DobberHockey (Wednesdays). Click that Ramblings button on the the menu bar!
(No I don't have a hockey problem...)