Re: So... They really changed the words to the Canadian National Anthem?
Originally Posted by
Rylant
However, if your defense of "tradition" is routed in something offensive, at some point, it needs to be considered. Slavery, beating your wife and children, women not being able to vote, the offensive team name "Redskins", have all been defended in the name of tradition, and it's wrong. While gender might not matter to you, it DOES matter to some, and that needs to be taken into consideration.
Anybody who claims that the line "in all thy sons command" is a tribute to the Canadian dead of WWI and WWII needs to realize that Canadian women died in those wars, too. They deserve the nation's respect as much as the men do.
Rylant
I don’t want to sound like I’m stuck in a time-warp but Women in WW1 were generally staying in Canada, and few went as nurses (something like 3000 served as nurses overseas AND in Canada) and under 50 died in WW1. If you can count the body total to the person (I know they have, 46? 48?) it’s not a big number. So I understand the “sons” being the word used.
But it could very well not be used to honour soldiers. I was just told this and haven’t done any research on it really.
But again, I don’t mind the change that is the sons command one. What the JA did was terrible. Anthem aside, he put his needs over his bands. Imagine the uproar if this was the Stars Spangled Banner? Omg he’d be dead.
12 Team, H2H, Keep 6 (in Bold)
G, A, Pts, PPP, FW, SOG, Hits, Blocks
W, Saves, S%, GAA, Game Started
2C, 2LW, 2RW, 4D, 1Util, 2G, 5BN, 2IR, 1IR+, 1NA
C: Horvat, Trocheck
LW: J. Robertson, Byfield (C), Guenther
RW: Pavelski (C), Giroux (C), Svechnikov (LW)
D: Fox, Makar, Bouchard, Morrissey, Gudas
Util: Meier (LW, RW)
G: Oettinger, Georgiev, Samsonov, Woll