Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 31 to 42 of 42

Thread: Dvorak for Laine

  1. #31
    Mr. Guru's Avatar
    Mr. Guru is offline
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    9,529
    Location
    Toronto
    Rep Power
    50

    The Great One

    Default Re: Dvorak for Laine

    A lot of those threads were from this past month.

    I was looking for more from Dvorak's draft year and the hype leading up to it. Again, I don't recall anyone on these forums hyping Dvorak pre his draft year. That's why I was curious.

    You made some good points about simply not knowing who would be better but going into his draft year Laine is light years ahead of where Dvorak was.

    2 Dvorak's for Laine is actually a pretty fair assessment if not undervaluing Laine.

    Imagine what Laine would and could do in the OHL in two years from now?!

  2. #32
    Location
    NS, Canada
    Rep Power
    50

    Dobber Sports Master

    Default Re: Dvorak for Laine

    Quote Originally Posted by Axeman33 View Post
    How do you know Dvorak will be a 55 pt guy? How do you know Laine will be a 75-80 pt guy?

    The simply answer is, you don't. None of us do. Anytime we give advice on anyone who has yet to step on the ice in the NHL it's an assumption.

    To be able to say that the 121 points that Dvorak just put up in 59 CHL games equates to a "solid NHLer and scoring at most 55 points" vs Laine who just put up 33 points in 46 SHL games makes Laine worth two Dvoraks is something of an assumption.

    Prospects are sold on hype and assumed value. Right now, the hype and assumed value on Laine is ridiculous and this happens every summer just before the draft. The same thing will happen next year at this same time. Who ever is ranked in the top three will more than likely be assumed to be more valuable than someone we were just hyping for the past year.

    I am not picking on you in particular Bottlenecker, it's just something I see every year. We hype the new kids and forget all about the ones who were hyped previously. Dvorak used to have excellent value too. Search the forums for his name, you will see it. For all we know, your assumptions could end up being true. I just hate seeing this same thing happen every year where we focus on the latest and greatest and quickly forget the others we had previously hyped and held in high regard.

    /endrant
    I know full well that my assumptions can be way off, and I am not on the hype train for Laine nor am I trying to downplay Dvorak's value. I just think Laine has a better ceiling based on his World Championship performance and his play amongst men in Finland. My point projections, while unsubstantiated for sure, were mine based on what I have seen for both guys, draft order, situation (assuming Winnipeg gets Laine) and a couple other things I use to calculate what one player is worth compared to another. I'm not really down on Dvorak, but don't think anyone would be willing to trade him straight up for Laine. That's all!

    Bottleneckers (12/16 in 2022)
    16 team, points only. G: 2-W, 4-SO.
    Top 9F, 4D & 1G . Keep 15, Max 23
    F: J. Robertson, J. Hughes, Tavares, Lafreniere, Cozens, Newhook, Teravainen, Domi, R. Strome, Laine, Rossi, Raymond, Holtz, Perfetti
    D: Bouchard, McAvoy, Morrissey, Heiskanen
    G: Vasilevskiy



  3. #33
    Location
    NS, Canada
    Rep Power
    50

    Dobber Sports Master

    Default Re: Dvorak for Laine

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Guru View Post
    A lot of those threads were from this past month.

    I was looking for more from Dvorak's draft year and the hype leading up to it. Again, I don't recall anyone on these forums hyping Dvorak pre his draft year. That's why I was curious.

    You made some good points about simply not knowing who would be better but going into his draft year Laine is light years ahead of where Dvorak was.

    2 Dvorak's for Laine is actually a pretty fair assessment if not undervaluing Laine.

    Imagine what Laine would and could do in the OHL in two years from now?!
    And that is what I thought too. Thanks for the support, Mr. Guru.

    Bottleneckers (12/16 in 2022)
    16 team, points only. G: 2-W, 4-SO.
    Top 9F, 4D & 1G . Keep 15, Max 23
    F: J. Robertson, J. Hughes, Tavares, Lafreniere, Cozens, Newhook, Teravainen, Domi, R. Strome, Laine, Rossi, Raymond, Holtz, Perfetti
    D: Bouchard, McAvoy, Morrissey, Heiskanen
    G: Vasilevskiy



  4. #34
    Location
    Nova Scotia
    Rep Power
    40

    Dobber Sports Deity

    Default Re: Dvorak for Laine

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Guru View Post
    A lot of those threads were from this past month.

    I was looking for more from Dvorak's draft year
    and the hype leading up to it. Again, I don't recall anyone on these forums hyping Dvorak pre his draft year. That's why I was curious.

    You made some good points about simply not knowing who would be better but going into his draft year Laine is light years ahead of where Dvorak was.

    2 Dvorak's for Laine is actually a pretty fair assessment if not undervaluing Laine.

    Imagine what Laine would and could do in the OHL in two years from now?!
    I cannot search that far back. Believe me, I tried finding them but when I type in his name it only lets me go back so far.

    Also, I was more referring to the hype around him as of late and his perceived value vs other prospects.

    Anyways, I think I have made my point here and I don't really like repeating myself as to why I feel this anti-hype on pre-drafted players needs to be mentioned.
    10 Team, Points Only, Cash League

    25 Man Roster (no position), top 20 point getters count at end of month
    Keep 20/25 at seasons end, Cut 5 to FA for redrafting
    Goalie points W=2pt L=-1pt SHO=2pt

    Stamkos, Tavares, Eichel, Mercer, JRobertson, RThomas, Kucherov, Nugent-Hopkins, Tuch, KConnor, Necas, Point, Konecny, SJarvis, Cozenz, Morrissey, Bouchard, Josi, Novak, Tolvanen, Peterka, Brink

    G- Vasilevskiy, Sorokin, Oettinger


    "Cleavage is like the sun. You can look, but dont stare.. Unless you're wearing sunglasses."

  5. #35
    franklin's Avatar
    franklin is offline
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    2,554
    Rep Power
    37

    Dobber Sports Veteran

    Default Re: Dvorak for Laine

    Dvorak is a really good prospect. But Laine is 2 years younger and already a better prospect.
    Points only keeper league
    7 teams
    28 keepers
    Weekly line up: 12 F / 6 D / 2 G
    Goalie stats: W=2 / SO=2

  6. #36
    Location
    Canada
    Rep Power
    50

    Dobber Sports Juggernaut

    Default Re: Dvorak for Laine

    Quote Originally Posted by praba View Post
    about 4 or 5 more Dvoraks
    LOL... NICE

    But true! Not even close fella.

  7. #37
    theIceWookie's Avatar
    theIceWookie is offline
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,310
    Rep Power
    31

    Dobber Sports Ace

    Default Re: Dvorak for Laine

    I'll try to add my thoughts here for what it's worth.

    Laine has current higher value. That value is for obvious reasons; Being a potential top 3 pick, his WC play, his Liiga playoffs play, this being his draft year, his shot etc. His perceived value is going to be at an all time high right now.

    Dvorak's should also be high, but not at Laine's level. He's not a past first round pick, he's playing with a high profile player (who was former top 5 pick) who is a top 5 player in the CHL, he's recently turned twenty which will lead to the incorrect assumption that he's an overage player. But he's also put up huge point totals two years running, and been an integral part of the Memorial Cup winning team this year. He has talent for sure, and he certainly has value. (as an aside, he has his hypey fans, Craig Button among them...)

    Dvoark had a lot of pre-draft hype going into his draft year. From what I remember he was billed as a potential top 10/15 pick, but because of a knee injury he had in January of his draft year, he struggled to play in a ton of games and struggled to really get anything consistent going. He showed lots of flashes of talented but never really hit on anything until his draft plus one year. Most of his first season he played on the wing, and it wasn't until his second season with the Knights that he transitioned to center (where he's very clearly flourished).

    He's a pretty reliable two-way player, showing good head knowledge of how to play defense as a center, and he's a hard worker. He also has a very good shot, and heads up playmaking. His skating is also above average, probably leaning towards being on the higher end side of things. Yes he's been playing with Marner and that helps him put up points, but that speaks to his ability to think the game well. He plays so well with Marner because he knows where to be to put himself in a position to score, or because he knows where Marner/Tkachuk are going to go. That's a good thing and he's shown off some serious offensive talent. Sure he's in his draft plus two year, but it's not exactly the easiest thing in the world to put up 100 points (let along do it two seasons in a row) or lead the league in goals. He's also not small, being listed either as 6'0 or 6'1 but being listed as 200-205. All that said, I think his future is a little limited, simply because of what players will be ahead of him. He's going to be competing against Strome, and that's a tough battle to win. I think because of that fact he'll be limited to a 2nd line role (which is totally fine honestly) and that will limit his total top end output. Strome has the draft pedigree, the production as well, and the size that you want as a number 1C. Dvorak will have an uphill battle to beat him for prime time. It's more likely that his top end production is around 55-60 points than 65-70.

    Now onto Laine. Laine's got a killer shot, one of the best that I've seen in a prospect in a long time. It's evoked images of Ovechkin (though I don't agree) and Stamkos since he loves to sit in the Stammer spot and shoot. He's also big and has shown an ability to move through players to get to a position he needs to score in. He obviously had some very impressive goal totals through the Liiga playoffs and through the WC to set historical records for an 18 year old at the tournament. What's more impressive is his ability to put shots on the net. He shoots and he shoots a lot. While I don't agree his shot is as good as Ovechkin's (it's still incredibly good), his ability to create shots is approaching Ovechkin level. It's not just elite, it's practically the best ever for a recent Finnish prospect, beating out totals by Barkov, Granlund, Armia etc (as an aside, Puljujarvi also beat those totals to be the 2nd best Finnish prospect is recent history). Now Laine's gotten an extraordinary amount of hype, for good reason, but it has gotten a little out of hand. He's not a perfect prospect. His skating is a weakness, and while it's come a long way, he'll need to improve it long term. It won't limit him, but it will need to be worked on. Barkov is a good example to follow for how that progression can work, as he's come a long way since his first season. I'd expect a similar learning curve skating wise for Laine. However he'll never be the power forward that Ovechkin is, his skating is nowhere near as explosive and strong. He can be an effective power forward, but he won't be generational and it might prevent him from being a franchise power forward IMO. I also question Laine's ability to shoot on a tighter skating surface. He would have had a lot more time to find space and take shots in Finland than he'll get in NA, and he'll need a good chunk of his season to adjust. Again it won't limit him but it'll take some time while he figures out how to play in that sort of new situation. Laine's almost a guarantee to start in the NHL next season and since he's playing on the wing, he won't need to worry about playing as strong a two-way game as if he was a center. This is a positive for his initial play and longer term play. He can be put in a much stronger position to succeed as a trigger man than Dvorak ever could since Dvorak plays center. He's got a much easier path to top line time and top PP time than Dvorak does. On Winnipeg Laine is basically their top sniper option and will be given prime opportunities with that. That's a huge thing for his fantasy potential next season and moving forward. He's almost assured top line time going forward.

    In sum I think Laine is the clear choice here. As much as Dvorak is a talented player, he doesn't have nearly as easy a time getting prime time that Laine will. I don't think people are out of line for taking the Laine side pretty easily.
    14T BiWeekly H2H. 4 C/RW/LW, 6 D, 2 G
    Cats:G(3), A(1.5), PIM(0.2), PPP(1), SOG(0.2), GWG(1), SHP(2), Hits(0.3), BkS(0.4). W(2), SO(2), OTL(0.5), SV(0.2), GA(-1), L(-1). 9 Keepers in Bold. 12 player Farm team (skaters under 110, goalies under 80 gp) in italics

    LW - Gaudreau, Forsberg, Parise, Hyman (C)
    C - Backstrom, Getzlaf, N Foligno (LW/RW), Kotkaniemi, Carter (LW/RW)
    RW - Tarasenko, Rantanen, Arvidsson, Atkinson, Gourde (C/LW), Mikheyev (RW)
    D - Dahlin, Theodore, Ellis, Klingberg, Fox, Andersson
    G - Murray, Grubauer

    Prospects -Rossi, Turcotte, Kravstov, Tippett, Bouchard, Lehtonen, K Miller, Addison, DeSmith, Kahkonen, Ingram, Gustavsson

  8. #38
    deantime419's Avatar
    deantime419 is offline
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    2,884
    Location
    Edmonton
    Rep Power
    28

    Dobber Sports Veteran

    Default Re: Dvorak for Laine

    In most leagues, if I were trading Laine it'd be in a package to get an elite proven youngster, not a handful of lesser prospects.
    Just a huge risk trading Laine for 3 Dvorak's.
    12 tm pts only dynasty
    F (count 12): Bedard, Boldy, Beniers, Cooley, Michkov, Norris, Landeskog, Rossi, Reichel, Pelletier, Tomasino, Foerster, Bordeleau, Lysell, Wahlstrom, Bourque, Stankoven, Nazar, Othmann, Ostlund, O.Moore
    D (count 6): McAvoy, Kylington, Byram, Boqvist, Perunovich, Lundkvist, L.Hughes, Zellweger, Morrow
    G (count 2): Askarov, Wallstedt, Wolf, Kochetkov, Levi
    3 round draft and 1 waiver per team per year

  9. #39
    Referee3083's Avatar
    Referee3083 is offline
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,800
    Location
    CA
    Rep Power
    32

    Dobber Sports Stud

    Default Re: Dvorak for Laine

    Quote Originally Posted by deantime419 View Post
    In most leagues, if I were trading Laine it'd be in a package to get an elite proven youngster, not a handful of lesser prospects.
    Just a huge risk trading Laine for 3 Dvorak's.
    Who are some examples of what you would consider elite, proven youngsters? Tarasenko, Kucherov?
    12 Team Weekly H2H, Daily Lineups. Keep 7 + 1 Prospect (<164 NHL games).
    Scoring:
    PLAYER: G(3), A(2), D Pts(addt'l 0.7), +/-(0.5), PPP(addt'l 1), SHP(addt'l 0.5), SOG(0.4), BLK(0.8)
    GOALIE: W(2), GA(-1.5), Saves(0.3), SO(3)
    Positions - 3C, 2RW, 2LW, 4D, 2G, 5 Bench, 4 IR, 1 prospect

    C - J Hughes(LW), Hintz, Malkin, Pinto
    LW - M Tkachuk(RW), Robertson
    RW - Rust, Necas, Zuccarello
    D - Makar, Fox, Bouchard, Roy, Krug
    G - Oettinger, Thompson, Wedgewood
    Prospect Keeper - L Hughes(D)
    IR - Hill(G)

    2024 Picks - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11

  10. #40
    Location
    Brampton, Ontario
    Rep Power
    40

    Dobber Sports Titan

    Default Re: Dvorak for Laine

    Quote Originally Posted by Referee3083 View Post
    Who are some examples of what you would consider elite, proven youngsters? Tarasenko, Kucherov?
    Those would be two. Gaudreau, Kuzzy and Forsberg are a few other examples of what I would consider in that category.
    Associate Editor for DobberHockey (Wednesdays). Click that Ramblings button on the the menu bar!
    (No I don't have a hockey problem...)

  11. #41
    deantime419's Avatar
    deantime419 is offline
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    2,884
    Location
    Edmonton
    Rep Power
    28

    Dobber Sports Veteran

    Default Re: Dvorak for Laine

    Kuch. Gaudreau. Tank. Kuznetsov. Mackinnon.
    12 tm pts only dynasty
    F (count 12): Bedard, Boldy, Beniers, Cooley, Michkov, Norris, Landeskog, Rossi, Reichel, Pelletier, Tomasino, Foerster, Bordeleau, Lysell, Wahlstrom, Bourque, Stankoven, Nazar, Othmann, Ostlund, O.Moore
    D (count 6): McAvoy, Kylington, Byram, Boqvist, Perunovich, Lundkvist, L.Hughes, Zellweger, Morrow
    G (count 2): Askarov, Wallstedt, Wolf, Kochetkov, Levi
    3 round draft and 1 waiver per team per year

  12. #42
    Rep Power
    0

    Dobber Sports Novice

    Default Re: Dvorak for Laine

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Guru View Post
    I don't think there's was ever really any hype on Dvorak.. I don't recall anyways.

    I'd actually be curious and appreciative if anyone dug up some previous Dvorak hype threads.
    I can say with a straight face that I have never run into any Dvorak hype. I follow prospects all the time. Even was my job once upon a time.

    All I can honestly say is, if you really want to know how good a player is drop a dime and find out. For starters all kinds of free info out there. Find a reliable source and stick with it. Watch as many iso videos of the player as you can. Nothing better than your own eye and your own judgement. Makes winning even more special. or ....

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •