Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 16 to 26 of 26

Thread: Quick or Crawford

  1. #16
    Location
    BetweenLeiasBuns
    Rep Power
    50

    Dobber Sports Genius

    Default Re: Quick or Crawford

    Quote Originally Posted by Eskimo Brother View Post
    Damn, I'm amazed I didn't come up with that...
    Quit crowing about this and take Crawford.
    Hockey Pools? Too many to mention. Points only, salary cap and dynasty.

  2. #17
    Location
    Chicago
    Rep Power
    50

    Dobber Sports Sage

    Default Re: Quick or Crawford

    Quote Originally Posted by Big Baby View Post
    I like Quick here. Call me stubborn but I'm not buying in on the whole Crawford thing.

    I know both goalies are overrated by many, but Quick stands out as a goalie who can come through when the game is on the line.
    Crawford is underrated.

    Crawford > Quick
    10 Team, 60 Player Roster
    G, A, PTS, PPP, PIM, BLKs, Hits, +/-, Shots, W, GAA, SV%, Saves
    C- JHughes, Trocheck, RThomas, Zegras, Norris, Bennett, PLD, Stephenson, Danualt
    RW- Raymond, Stone, TWilson, Toffoli, KJohnson, Nyqvist, Zary
    LW- Keller, Schmaltz, Bunting, Skinner, Barbashev, Duclair
    D- QHughes, McAvoy, Doughty, Heiskanen, LHughes, Mintyukov
    G- Shesterkin, Demko, Andersen, Kahkonen, Levi, Tarasov, Annunen

    Notable Prospects- Nikishin, Kulich, Leonard, Wood, Perreault, Lekkermaki, Ostlund, Othmman, REvans, L-Heureux, Ivanov, Murashov

  3. #18
    Location
    Brampton, Ontario
    Rep Power
    40

    Dobber Sports Titan

    Default Re: Quick or Crawford

    Quote Originally Posted by Call of Doughty View Post
    Quit crowing about this and take Crawford.
    I thought about that, but it was too much of a stretch for me. The pun master on the other hand, can pull it off!
    Associate Editor for DobberHockey (Wednesdays). Click that Ramblings button on the the menu bar!
    (No I don't have a hockey problem...)

  4. #19
    The Guvnah's Avatar
    The Guvnah is offline
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    1,101
    Location
    Ontario
    Rep Power
    26

    Dobber Sports Padawan

    Default Re: Quick or Crawford

    People picking Quick here really sticks in my craw!


    10th year Keeper League, Fantrax

    14 teams, H2H, keep 10, daily starts
    G (3), A (2), +/- (1), PIM (0.1), PPP (1), FOW (0.1), FOL (-0.1), BLK (0.5), HAT (3), W (5), SO (3), SV (0.1), GA (-0.5)

    C (3) - Schmaltz (LW, RW), Mercer (RW), Norris (IR), Domi (LW), T. Johnson (RW), Nosek (LW)
    LW (3) - Keller (RW), Hagel, McCann (C), Zacha (LW), Kubalik (RW), N. Foligno (IR)
    RW (3) - Fiala (LW), Vilardi (C), Ehlers (LW), Kakko
    D (4) - Theodore, Orlov, Grzelcyk, T. van Riemsdyk, Clifton, Skjei, Weegar
    Util (1)
    G (1) - Montembault, Allen, Halak



  5. #20
    Sulla's Avatar
    Sulla is offline
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    9,585
    Rep Power
    50

    The Great One

    Default Re: Quick or Crawford

    Quote Originally Posted by Eskimo Brother View Post
    I thought about that, but it was too much of a stretch for me. The pun master on the other hand, can pull it off!
    and I always thought you were quick on the craw.... Too far?
    Experience is the teacher of all things.


  6. #21
    Location
    Brampton, Ontario
    Rep Power
    40

    Dobber Sports Titan

    Default Re: Quick or Crawford

    Quote Originally Posted by Sulla View Post
    and I always thought you were quick on the craw.... Too far?
    You guys are all going about this too Quick-ly. you have to think through the puns, so you don't end up with a piece of Craw-p one. I mean they're less fun than a Ford car.
    Associate Editor for DobberHockey (Wednesdays). Click that Ramblings button on the the menu bar!
    (No I don't have a hockey problem...)

  7. #22
    Location
    Vancouver Island
    Rep Power
    40

    Dobber Sports Jedi

    Default Re: Quick or Crawford

    One thing has become blatantly obvious.. when the boards are slow, the quality of response regress significantly to fill space and time.
    Follow me on twitter: @doylelb4

  8. #23
    Location
    Brampton, Ontario
    Rep Power
    40

    Dobber Sports Titan

    Default Re: Quick or Crawford

    Quote Originally Posted by lucafen4 View Post
    One thing has become blatantly obvious.. when the boards are slow, the quality of response regress significantly to fill space and time.
    Yup. The last two goalie threads of note have descended into phallic jokes and name puns. That's kind of what you expect when sports guys talk about non-sports things though…
    Associate Editor for DobberHockey (Wednesdays). Click that Ramblings button on the the menu bar!
    (No I don't have a hockey problem...)

  9. #24
    tomastop's Avatar
    tomastop is offline
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    2,250
    Location
    Slovakia
    Rep Power
    47

    Dobber Sports Pro

    Default Re: Quick or Crawford

    Crawford for me. My league (in sig) uses similar cats and I was surprised at some point during last season, when checking with FHG, Crawford was the best goalie in our league, even better than Holtby or Bishop.
    12 teams, Yahoo H2H, daily, keep 5.

    3C, 3LW, 3RW, 6D, 2G, 5BN, IR+
    G, A, P, +/-, PIM, PPP, SHP, GWG, SOG, FW, HIT, BLK
    W, GAA, SA, SV%, SHO

    C: McDavid, MacKinnon, Eichel, Pettersson
    LW: M.Tkachuk (+RW), Zucker (+RW), Coleman (+RW), N.Foligno (+C)
    RW: Kucherov, Svechnikov (+LW), W.Nylander (+C), Kassian
    D: Karlsson, Hughes,Doughty, Ekblad, Hronek, McNabb, Cernak
    G: Lehner, Grubauer, Francouz
    IR+:

  10. #25
    jdreed3184's Avatar
    jdreed3184 is offline
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    1,366
    Location
    Denver
    Rep Power
    32

    Dobber Sports Ace

    Default Re: Quick or Crawford

    Love it - at first I didn't get the Ford reference but then......crawFORD.

    Good stuff.

    For what it's worth, despite my concern about the Hawks salary cap, I take Crawford over Quick. I see a better defense and more consistency in performance.
    H2H Dynasty, 16 Team Salary: G, A, PPP, SOG, Hits, BKS, SHTOI, W, Sv%, Saves, GA%, (4C, 4RW, 4LW, 6D, 1G)

    C: Crosby, Malkin, Larkin, Hartman, McBain, Joshua
    RW: Rantanen, Konecny, Strome, Batherson, Zetterland
    LW: Buchnevich, Ehlers, Marchessault, Bertuzzi, Acciari
    D: McNabb, Ferraro, Hakanpaa, Lyabushkin, Samuelsson, Bernard-Docker, Emberson
    G: Merzlikens, Daccord, Samsonov
    Prospects: Kurich, Lucius, Pelletier, Cristall, Yurov, Beckman, Brisson, Dean, Phillips, Poitras

  11. #26
    Location
    Brampton, Ontario
    Rep Power
    40

    Dobber Sports Titan

    Default Re: Quick or Crawford

    Quote Originally Posted by jdreed3184 View Post
    Love it - at first I didn't get the Ford reference but then......crawFORD.

    Good stuff.

    For what it's worth, despite my concern about the Hawks salary cap, I take Crawford over Quick. I see a better defense and more consistency in performance.
    Yeah, especially with Campbell back on a cheap contract. That is huge for them.
    Associate Editor for DobberHockey (Wednesdays). Click that Ramblings button on the the menu bar!
    (No I don't have a hockey problem...)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •