Reply With Quote1 year, or is this longer term.
My initial thought though is Crawford.
Quick or Crawford
Stats:
W
SO
GAA
SV%
Saves
12 team keeper
dress 12F 6D 2G, bench 6F 3D 2G
keep 8 F, 4D, 1G, draft every year for the rest.
Forwards: 2pts/Goal 1pt/Assist 4pts/hattrick
Defense: 3pts/Goal 1.5pts/Assist 6 pts/hattrick
Both: 0.05 pts/Hit 0.05/Blocked shot
Goalie: 2pts/win 1pt/tie 5pts/Shutout 0.02pts/save
Dressed
F - STAMKOS, OVECHKIN, KUCHEROV, PAVELSKI, BACKSTROM, DROUIN, PANARIN, WHEELER, Landeskog, Cammalieri, Marleau, Ward
D - HEDMAN, EKMAN-LARSSON, BARRIE, PARAYKO, Markov, Savard
G - HOLTBY, Anderson
Bench
F - Burakovsky, Killorn, Hertl, Read, Rantanen, Sutter
D - Trouba, Niskanen, Zidlicky
G - Halak, Hammond
Re: Quick or Crawford
1 year, or is this longer term.
My initial thought though is Crawford.
Associate Editor for DobberHockey (Wednesdays). Click that Ramblings button on the the menu bar!
(No I don't have a hockey problem...)
Re: Quick or Crawford
H2H keeper, so who's the better asset and will be effective for longer?
12 team keeper
dress 12F 6D 2G, bench 6F 3D 2G
keep 8 F, 4D, 1G, draft every year for the rest.
Forwards: 2pts/Goal 1pt/Assist 4pts/hattrick
Defense: 3pts/Goal 1.5pts/Assist 6 pts/hattrick
Both: 0.05 pts/Hit 0.05/Blocked shot
Goalie: 2pts/win 1pt/tie 5pts/Shutout 0.02pts/save
Dressed
F - STAMKOS, OVECHKIN, KUCHEROV, PAVELSKI, BACKSTROM, DROUIN, PANARIN, WHEELER, Landeskog, Cammalieri, Marleau, Ward
D - HEDMAN, EKMAN-LARSSON, BARRIE, PARAYKO, Markov, Savard
G - HOLTBY, Anderson
Bench
F - Burakovsky, Killorn, Hertl, Read, Rantanen, Sutter
D - Trouba, Niskanen, Zidlicky
G - Halak, Hammond
Re: Quick or Crawford
I like Quick here. Call me stubborn but I'm not buying in on the whole Crawford thing.
I know both goalies are overrated by many, but Quick stands out as a goalie who can come through when the game is on the line.
LA is in a better position to financially to move forward. Chicago will have problems down the line.
6 Team no limit Keeper. Cap league $100m
Points only G/A=1, Hattrick = +3, Wins = 2, SO = +3, OTL/SOL = +1
12 Forwards, 6 Defense, 2 Goalies, 6 Reserve (any position)
Forwards
Crosby $8.7
Stone $9.5
Svechnikov $7.7
Debrincat $6.4
Hall $6
Meier $6
Guentzel $6
Ehlers $6
Hertl $5.6
Konecny $5.5
Palat $5.3
JT Miller $5.2
Garland $4.9
Kakko $.9
Laff $.9
Defense
Josi $9
Burns $8
Letang $7.2
Nurse $5.6
Werenski $5
Sergachev $4.8
Fox $.9
Goalies
Shesterkin $5.6
Ullmark $5
Hart $3.9
Blackwood $2.8
Re: Quick or Crawford
Personally I have a little more faith in Crawford down the line, but it is very close
Associate Editor for DobberHockey (Wednesdays). Click that Ramblings button on the the menu bar!
(No I don't have a hockey problem...)
Re: Quick or Crawford
I like Crawford here. Damn close though. Need a crystal ball to know for sure.
KHL Fantasy Hockey League Keep 8
3-C 3-RW 3-LW 6-D 2-G
Forward 5-G 3-A 1.0 STP
D-Men 6-G 4-A 1.5 STP
.35 Shot .4 Hit .4 Block .1 FOW
Goalie 6.5 Win .25 Save -2.5 GA 2-SO
C- Larkin, Hischer, Horvat, R. Thomas
LW- Stamkos, Hyman, Kreider, Lehkonen,
RW- Laine, Marchessault, Toffoli. Buchnevich
D- Doughty, Burns, Letang, Andersson (IR), Faulk, Toews, Pionk, Petry
G- Vasilevskiy, Copley, Andersen
Re: Quick or Crawford
I find Quick is overrated in fantasy and Crawford is underrated in fantasy.
Crawford for me.
10 Team, Points Only, Cash League
25 Man Roster (no position), top 20 point getters count at end of month
Keep 20/25 at seasons end, Cut 5 to FA for redrafting
Goalie points W=2pt L=-1pt SHO=2pt
Stamkos, Tavares, Eichel, Mercer, JRobertson, RThomas, Kucherov, Nugent-Hopkins, Tuch, KConnor, Necas, Point, Konecny, SJarvis, Cozenz, Morrissey, Bouchard, Josi, Novak, Tolvanen, Peterka, Brink
G- Vasilevskiy, Sorokin, Oettinger
"Cleavage is like the sun. You can look, but dont stare.. Unless you're wearing sunglasses."
Re: Quick or Crawford
We've already seen chinks in the armor for the Kings. They looked like a powerhouse with two months left, then fell off and did't even win the division. The defense in front of Quick slumped and thus so did he. Doughty is still young, but he will age fast if they keep playing him 28 minutes every night. You just can't rely on one guy to be your whole D corps. We've also seen signs of that from the Hawks, but their bigger problem is depth. I have yet to figure out that trade of Oduya and Johns, that one came back to haunt them. They lost two games in the St. Louis series because of rookie mistakes and it cost them the series. With all that, Crawford stood up and kept them in it. He had a couple saves last night that were just ridiculous. I have more confidence in the Hawks to protect Crawford than in LA to help Quick, and I do subscribe to the "Crawford is underrated" school. So I take Crawford anyday. He will be playing on the better team over the next three years.
20-team NHL cap keeper; auction salaries w/contracts; 4C, 4LW, 4RW, 6D, 2G, 3B, 18 farm
H2H Cat Wins: G, A, Pts, 2G+A, DPts, PIM, SOG, Hits, Blks, FO%, STG, GWG, G Wins, GAA, Save %, ShO
C: Stamkos, Toews, DRyan, Compher, Fisher, Haula
LW: Lucic, Tkachuk, Eriksson Ek, Connor
RW: Radulov, Tarasenko, JWilliams, Point, Callahan
D: Braun, Del Zotto, McNabb, CMiller, Petry, Subban, Butcher
G: Andersen, Rinne
Farm: Anderson-Dolan, Beaudin, O?Regan, Suzuki, Kayumov, Bastian, Pu, Meloche, Pionk, Poolman, Montembault, Hill
Re: Quick or Crawford
We count the same stats and there's no chance I'd trade Crawford for Quick
10 team full keeper roto 4C/LW/RW,6D,2G
G,A,P,+/-,PIM,SOG,GWG,PPP,SHP,Hit,Blk,FOW
W,GAA,SV,SV%,SHO
C-Aho,Couturier,Matthews,O'Reilly
LW-Ehlers,Giroux,Panarin,Rust
RW-Kucherov,Palmieri,Pastrnak,Wilson
D-Burns,Carlson,Gudas,Josi,Nurse,Pietrangelo
G-Fleury,F.Andersen,Markstrom
BN-Zacha
Under 250 gp farm
Beaucage,Berggren,Bokk,Brisson,Chytil,Dugan,Foerst er,Foote,Frost,Grewe,K.Johnson,Lindblom,Mikheyev,N ybeck,Peterka,Pospisil,Protas,Ranta,Raty,Stankoven ,Suzuki,Tuomaala
Alexeyev,Brook,Foote,Graves,Poirier,Sanderson,Seid er,Wilde,Woo,Zamula
Berdin,Brossoit,Commesso,Ersson,Husso,Knight,Koche tkov,Lafontaine,Oettinger,Primeau,Sandstrom,Stolar z,Ustimenko,Vladar
Re: Quick or Crawford
Crawford for me but it's close.
Keeper league 14 teams (H2H, 20 active players keep 16 NHLers, 16 minors)
Scoring Cats: G-A-PTS-PPG-PPA-(+/-)-HITS-BLK-SHP-SOG-FOW-GWG / W-L-SVS-SV%-GAA-SO
C- Crosby, Barzal, Bennett, Schmaltz, Novak
W- Forsberg, Batherson, Nichuskin, Tuch, Konecny, Maccelli, Sharangovich, Bertuzzi, Kaliyev, Neighbours, Reichel
D- Carlson, Rielly, Klingberg
G- Hellebuyck, Demko, Merzlikins, Vejmelka
Minors:
F: Fantilli, Cooley, Bourgault, Perreault, Cowan, Ohgren, N. Foote, Goyette, Iskhakov, Denisenko, Tracey
D: Simashev, Willander, Lambos
G: Schmidt, Rodrigue, DiPietro, Gaudreau, McKay
Re: Quick or Crawford
Crawford for me too, chosen mostly because of the differences in quality of the their respective top 4 defense corps. I think Quick is a tad more talented but plays behind an overused Doughty and a couple of #3s in Muzzin & Martinez. Crawford has the benefit of playing behind a solid top pair in Keith/Seabrook and a properly slotted #3 in Hjalmarsson. CHI's remaining d corps is pitiful though...
They both get serious amplitude on their streakiness though. If either goalie gets hot (or cold, for that matter), they stay in that mode for a while and then it flips on a dime. I owned Quick last season during a down year. Drove me nuts. In truth, maybe that bad taste in my mouth is driving my comments here.
14-team Keeper w/custom salary cap
Keep btw 12-14, excl. Minors
Skater cats (weight): G (1.75), A (1.75), +/- (0.75), Hits (0.75), BS (0.75)
Goalie cats: W (0.25), GAA (1.00), SV% (1.00)
C : Colton Jenner Frost Novak ---Rossi Cooley MSavoie Fantilli Carlsson Yager
LW: Caufield Fiala Hagel Nichushkin ---Musty
RW: Tippett Necas Brink Kakko ---Yurov Lysell Stankoven ECowan Lekkerimaki
D : Theodore Seider Chabot Gostisbehere Liljegren Carlo ---Edvinsson
G : Montembault Hart ---Commesso Augustine
Bench/IR: Zellweger Fehervary
2024 entry draft picks: 3 1sts
2025: 2 1sts, 2 2nds, 1 3rd
Fantrax IHL Champion: 2018/19, 2015/16, 2011/12
Re: Quick or Crawford
Im still mulling over this, lol... I feel its a toss up, im more of a hawks fan so im leaning Crow
12 team keeper
dress 12F 6D 2G, bench 6F 3D 2G
keep 8 F, 4D, 1G, draft every year for the rest.
Forwards: 2pts/Goal 1pt/Assist 4pts/hattrick
Defense: 3pts/Goal 1.5pts/Assist 6 pts/hattrick
Both: 0.05 pts/Hit 0.05/Blocked shot
Goalie: 2pts/win 1pt/tie 5pts/Shutout 0.02pts/save
Dressed
F - STAMKOS, OVECHKIN, KUCHEROV, PAVELSKI, BACKSTROM, DROUIN, PANARIN, WHEELER, Landeskog, Cammalieri, Marleau, Ward
D - HEDMAN, EKMAN-LARSSON, BARRIE, PARAYKO, Markov, Savard
G - HOLTBY, Anderson
Bench
F - Burakovsky, Killorn, Hertl, Read, Rantanen, Sutter
D - Trouba, Niskanen, Zidlicky
G - Halak, Hammond
Re: Quick or Crawford
Quick... take Crawford... the morning of bad puns continues.
Follow me on twitter: @doylelb4
Re: Quick or Crawford
Crawford... Quick is above average in a good team whereas Crawford is good on a good team. Both are undisputed and with that both will get wins and shut outs (Chicago has improved its D IMO). I do think the Hawks will give up more shots and with that Crawford posts more saves and a better save percentage. GAA may favour Quick but not by much
Experience is the teacher of all things.
Re: Quick or Crawford
Damn, I'm amazed I didn't come up with that...Originally Posted by lucafen4
Associate Editor for DobberHockey (Wednesdays). Click that Ramblings button on the the menu bar!
(No I don't have a hockey problem...)
Posting Permissions
