Reply With QuoteLooking at the team in your sig, I'd do it. You're loaded on D.
I'd go with either Campbell or Rielly. Rieilly will get more PP time with Phaneuf gone, but Toronto kinda stinks. Campbell is much older but he's a fix on PP1.
Tarasenko for Burns
Thinking of offering my Burns for Tarasenko... Both are usually fantasy studs and their stats are very close this year, but Both have been slumping the past month. I'm thinking Tarasenko has more potential to bust out in the homestretch. I'd have to pick up a Dman to replace Burns.
Some FA options are: Markov, Green, Daley, B. Campbell, Rielly, Martinez, Holden. Thoughts? Thanks!
20 team, 56 player roster (30 minors) Full Dynasty Salary Cap H2H League. G, A, SOG, STP, HIT, BLK, FOW, TK/GV, GPT3, SV, SV%ES
14 team, 29 player roster (6 Minors) - Keep 20 players + 6 Minors Dynasty H2H League G, A, P, PPG, PPA, PPP, SOG, HIT, BLK, W, GAA, SV%, SV, SHO
12 team, 18 player roster - Full Re-Draft H2H League. G, A, P, +/-, PIM, PPP, SHP, GWG, SOG. W, GAA, SV%, SHO
Re: Tarasenko for Burns
Looking at the team in your sig, I'd do it. You're loaded on D.
I'd go with either Campbell or Rielly. Rieilly will get more PP time with Phaneuf gone, but Toronto kinda stinks. Campbell is much older but he's a fix on PP1.
twitter: @hugotwigg
Re: Tarasenko for Burns
I would agree. Jump on that and add Rielly
Associate Editor for DobberHockey (Wednesdays). Click that Ramblings button on the the menu bar!
(No I don't have a hockey problem...)
Re: Tarasenko for Burns
Thanks for the input guys, the offer is sent out.
20 team, 56 player roster (30 minors) Full Dynasty Salary Cap H2H League. G, A, SOG, STP, HIT, BLK, FOW, TK/GV, GPT3, SV, SV%ES
14 team, 29 player roster (6 Minors) - Keep 20 players + 6 Minors Dynasty H2H League G, A, P, PPG, PPA, PPP, SOG, HIT, BLK, W, GAA, SV%, SV, SHO
12 team, 18 player roster - Full Re-Draft H2H League. G, A, P, +/-, PIM, PPP, SHP, GWG, SOG. W, GAA, SV%, SHO
Re: Tarasenko for Burns
Hard to say if they will accept or not. If they look at the numbers, they may be tempted. If they just look at the names, I would be surprised they accept. Tarasenko's name carries more weight.
Good luck.
10 Team, Points Only, Cash League
25 Man Roster (no position), top 20 point getters count at end of month
Keep 20/25 at seasons end, Cut 5 to FA for redrafting
Goalie points W=2pt L=-1pt SHO=2pt
Stamkos, Tavares, Eichel, Mercer, JRobertson, RThomas, Kucherov, Nugent-Hopkins, Tuch, KConnor, Necas, Point, Konecny, SJarvis, Cozenz, Morrissey, Bouchard, Josi, Novak, Tolvanen, Peterka, Brink
G- Vasilevskiy, Sorokin, Oettinger
"Cleavage is like the sun. You can look, but dont stare.. Unless you're wearing sunglasses."
Re: Tarasenko for Burns
In a 1yr league I think this is a very fair “hockey trade” if he needs D. You’re loaded at D, and need some help on the wings. If he has the opposite situation, it’s a nice lateral move for (might diminish in the periph cats, I’m not sure).
But if the GM is going off of name weight and not focusing on this yr (does happen in 1 yrs), I wouldn’t be surprised if he declines.
12 Team, H2H, Keep 6 (in Bold)
G, A, Pts, PPP, FW, SOG, Hits, Blocks
W, Saves, S%, GAA, Game Started
2C, 2LW, 2RW, 4D, 1Util, 2G, 5BN, 2IR, 1IR+, 1NA
C: Horvat, Trocheck
LW: J. Robertson, Byfield (C), Guenther
RW: Pavelski (C), Giroux (C), Svechnikov (LW)
D: Fox, Makar, Bouchard, Morrissey, Gudas
Util: Meier (LW, RW)
G: Oettinger, Georgiev, Samsonov, Woll
Re: Tarasenko for Burns
Burns' best value is not in your categories. If your fellow GM is shrewd he'll reject the offer. But if he takes it then great.
DobberHockey Senior Writer (columnist since 2012)
Click here to read my weekly "Roos Lets Loose" columns, going live every Wednesday morning and consisting of a rotating schedule of a "forum buzz" column, a fantasy hockey mailbag, a tournament/poll, and an edition of Goldipucks and the Three Skaters: https://dobberhockey.com/category/ho...key-rick-roos/
Re: Tarasenko for Burns
Ok he's countered with his Tarasenko for my Burns and Draisaitl. I already own Mcdavid so I think Draisaitl is expendable.. Plus he's really slowed down the second half. Thoughts? Should I accept!? Thanks guys!!
Re: Tarasenko for Burns
I think it's too much but that's just my opinion. As I mentioned earlier, by the numbers Burns and Tarasenko aren't that far apart. He's looking at names. It's numbers that win your hockey pools.
I wouldn't do that deal.
10 Team, Points Only, Cash League
25 Man Roster (no position), top 20 point getters count at end of month
Keep 20/25 at seasons end, Cut 5 to FA for redrafting
Goalie points W=2pt L=-1pt SHO=2pt
Stamkos, Tavares, Eichel, Mercer, JRobertson, RThomas, Kucherov, Nugent-Hopkins, Tuch, KConnor, Necas, Point, Konecny, SJarvis, Cozenz, Morrissey, Bouchard, Josi, Novak, Tolvanen, Peterka, Brink
G- Vasilevskiy, Sorokin, Oettinger
"Cleavage is like the sun. You can look, but dont stare.. Unless you're wearing sunglasses."
Re: Tarasenko for Burns
He's now saying he'd do my Klingberg and Draisaitl for his Tarasenko. I think Klingberg is more expendable Than burns. Thoughts?Thanks again.
Re: Tarasenko for Burns
My Klingberg and Draisaiti for his Tarasenko and Markov. I get a lot of assists but need goal scoring. I think this deal addresses that. If Markov doesn't pan out, I have some waiver wire options. Any final thoughts? Thanks again
Re: Tarasenko for Burns
I prefer that deal to the original offer.
10 Team, Points Only, Cash League
25 Man Roster (no position), top 20 point getters count at end of month
Keep 20/25 at seasons end, Cut 5 to FA for redrafting
Goalie points W=2pt L=-1pt SHO=2pt
Stamkos, Tavares, Eichel, Mercer, JRobertson, RThomas, Kucherov, Nugent-Hopkins, Tuch, KConnor, Necas, Point, Konecny, SJarvis, Cozenz, Morrissey, Bouchard, Josi, Novak, Tolvanen, Peterka, Brink
G- Vasilevskiy, Sorokin, Oettinger
"Cleavage is like the sun. You can look, but dont stare.. Unless you're wearing sunglasses."
Re: Tarasenko for Burns
Thanks for the input. Offer acceptedOriginally Posted by Axeman33
Posting Permissions
