Reply With QuoteI would want more. Probably one great player instead of two decent ones. You are giving up a keeper-quality player for two non-keepers in return.
Fleury
Goddamn this man. I offered my fleury for his mrazek and kadri. He was seriously considering it. Should I proceed?
10 Team ESPN league
Head-To-Head Most Categories, G, A, PIM, PPP, SHP, SOG, HIT, BLK, W, SV%, GAA, SO
C: Malkin, Tavares, McDavid
LW: Hall, Hartnell, Perron
RW: Kessel, Pavelski (C), Neal (LW), Hornqvist
D: Gudas, Orpik, Ekman-Larsson, Phaneuf
G: Holtby, Lundqvist, Fleury
Re: Fleury
I would want more. Probably one great player instead of two decent ones. You are giving up a keeper-quality player for two non-keepers in return.
Re: Fleury
Don't really care about the keepers. Fleury is my third goalie looking for some kind of upgrade (I have six pens on my team)
10 Team ESPN league
Head-To-Head Most Categories, G, A, PIM, PPP, SHP, SOG, HIT, BLK, W, SV%, GAA, SO
C: Malkin, Tavares, McDavid
LW: Hall, Hartnell, Perron
RW: Kessel, Pavelski (C), Neal (LW), Hornqvist
D: Gudas, Orpik, Ekman-Larsson, Phaneuf
G: Holtby, Lundqvist, Fleury
Re: Fleury
I think you can do better than that for Fleury, even though he was a funnel tonight..
Zorro says "vote for Dobber"
Angus is my best friend at dobberhockey..
Re: Fleury
FWIW, I actually prefer Fleury to Lundqvist for your league setup (although its very close).
I also have to think the Fleury is worth more than that. You are basically handing someone a keeper goalie because I can guarantee who ever you trade Fleury too, that team just got the better player. If you are taking two non-keepers for you, they had better be two of his best non-keepers. Considering how limited your keeper league is, I have a hard time seeing Kadri being one of his better non-keepers.
10 Team, Points Only, Cash League
25 Man Roster (no position), top 20 point getters count at end of month
Keep 20/25 at seasons end, Cut 5 to FA for redrafting
Goalie points W=2pt L=-1pt SHO=2pt
Stamkos, Tavares, Eichel, Mercer, JRobertson, RThomas, Kucherov, Nugent-Hopkins, Tuch, KConnor, Necas, Point, Konecny, SJarvis, Cozenz, Morrissey, Bouchard, Josi, Novak, Tolvanen, Peterka, Brink
G- Vasilevskiy, Sorokin, Oettinger
"Cleavage is like the sun. You can look, but dont stare.. Unless you're wearing sunglasses."
Re: Fleury
I also prefer Fleury to Lundqvist for your league. You also have to take age into account. I mean Fleury is no spring chicken either, but has a couple of years on Lundqvist.
Kadri is garbage in relative terms, while Mrazek is a good young goalie who MAY be a keeper for you for years to come. The question is= will you use Mrazek as a long term keeper or not. If not, then don't trade Fleury
I am a die-hard Avalanche fan!
PARTIAL DYNASTY (Keep 20 from year to year)
2C, 2LW, 2RW, 4D, 2G every night
G ,A, +/-, PIM, PPP, SOG, Hits, Blocks
Wins, Saves, SV%, GAA, SO
C-Eichel, Marner (RW), Matthews
L- Skinner, Pacioretty, Vanek, Perlini, Palat
R- Hoffman, Byron, Tuch, Kerfoot, Sprong
D- Ekblad, Gostisbehere, Rielly, Borowiecki, Montour, Girard, Orpik, Schenn
G-Fleury, Rask, Brossoit, Saros, Kuemper, Appleby
Re: Fleury
I'd only do this deal if you have faith enough in Mrazek to keep him long term. That would take more gumption than I have, to keep him over Fleury and King Henrik.
I'd probably keep Fleury over Henrik as he is younger and certainly a viable keeper also.
RETIRED
Posting Permissions
