Reply With QuoteI think, offensively, there's a little more there in terms of upside. But 50 points is probably more likely
Tom Wilson upside?
Will he peak to a 50pt 200PIM guy? Maybe a steady 40pt and 150PIM player?
Hopefully better than what Clarkson has shown us thus far.
Re: Tom Wilson upside?
I think, offensively, there's a little more there in terms of upside. But 50 points is probably more likely
The Best Fantasy Hockey Site
15-Team Keeper, points only, best 12 fwd, 4 dman, 2 G count. Playoffs count.
F - T. Thompson, Thomas, Nylander, Tarasenko, Arvidsson, Guentzel, Fiala, Quinn, Mittelstadt, Hagel, Zacha, Roslovic, Berggren, Brink, Ostlund
G - Kahkonen, Vejmelka, L. Thompson, Levi, Comrie
D - Hronek, Morrissey, Lundkvist, Girard, Brannstrom, Rathbone, Hanifin, Severson, Durzi
Re: Tom Wilson upside?
He hasn't exactly been used well in Washington so far. Should probably have been better served playing 20 minutes a night in junior or the AHL or wherever he would have played (too lazy to look it up).
GO WINGS!
Re: Tom Wilson upside?
Well, he's no Steve Downie, lol! But seriously, I'm high on his fantasy potential, but if he's only going to be used as a fourth line energy guy, then it's going to be a while before he sees a sniff of 50 or even 40 points.
Re: Tom Wilson upside?
He'll need at least another year likely two before he'll hold value in most league setups, but to me his upside is that of a cross-breed between Wayne Simmonds and Matt Martin. You're looking at a guy who will challenge for the "hits" title and could probably net 15-20 goals just because of how powerful he is...he'll get a lot of goals just by being in front of the net.
Posting Permissions
