Reply With Quotei only skimmed through it but it looks alright, much better than some other mock drafts ive seen.
Analysis of NHL.com's fantasy hockey mock draft
i only skimmed through it but it looks alright, much better than some other mock drafts ive seen.
One day I will quit fantasy hockey, today is not that day.
It seemed pretty good with actual thought put into the picks. I give them credit for actually doing a multi-category draft. It drives me slightly mad when magazines have supposed "experts" draft points only pools. It's easy, lazy and considering how few pools are points only these days you'd think they'd mock draft for multi-categories.. My only knock on the setup was they should have axed SO's to go 6:3 ratio instead of 6:4. All in all seemed to be a solid draft.
12 team H-2-H 1 year league, daily roster changes, 3 goalie start minimum/week
2xC, 2xRW, 2xLW, 4xD, 3xUtil, 2xG, 5 Bench
G, A, P, PIM, PPP, SHP, GWG, SOG, Hits, W, SV%, GAA, SVs
C: C. Keller, C. Mittelstadt, B. Nelson, R. Strome,
LW: K. Connor, B. Tkachuk, J. Gaudreau, J. Marchessault, E. Rodrigues, A. Lafreniere
RW: K. Fiala, J. Bratt, T. Jeannot V. Arvidsson
D: R. Josi, J. Trouba, E. Gustafsson,
G: L. Thompson, F. Gustavsson, V. Vanecek
NO IR
Not bad overall at all. Not sure I'm totally on board with all of the analysis though. Does Ovechkin really have that much more of a ceiling than Stamkos? I don't think he does but I suppose it's debatable.
F: P. Kane, Oshie, N. Foligno, Thorton, Coyle, Marleau, Pavelski, Dubinsky
Steen
D: seabrooke, Subban,wizniewski,garrison, Carle
G: Niemi, Fleury,
G/A-1 pt PIM- .25pts
Win-2pts Shutouts- 5pts(2+3)
Keep 10. Top 13 count (4 d, 1 g, 6 Frwd and next highest-any position)
Posting Permissions