With Eriksson now in Boston, who would you rather have -- Krejci or Eriksson? League is G =1, A = 0.5. Krejci has the better contract in our league ($1.25 x 5 yrs vs $2.25 x 1 yr for Eriksson - there's a $35 cap for 25 players).
Krejci is clearly the answer with those cap numbers. You basically get two Krejci's or one Ericksson. Krejci also has a wonderful contract for a long time.
I'm guessing similar numbers. Ericksson should go back to his 70 point ways. I won't be surprised when he leads the team in points. Worst case scenario with the balanced offence is 60 points. All-in-all the definition of the top 6 in Boston appears to have clarified somewhat. This is similar to the situation in which Dallas has been the past few years.
Krejci won't be far behind.
Still pretty early to assume who is on which line though.
Krejci or Eriksson?
Reply With Quote
