I honestly love this conversation and enjoyed the discussion all though I haven't the time to add anything worthwhile at the present. However one thing I would like to say is that after being in the field of education for 6 years now I often debate the validity between paper and pencil testing to alternative assessment.
Given the nature of jobs today, not only does one have to be intelligent in an individual sense but they also need to be able to critically think and then apply that knowledge. Paper and pencil testing for the most part does not lend to application which is something I've always been critical of for the most part. I had to write a paper based on the validty of grades back in university. I found a lot of journals etc on the issue but am at a loss for what I did with them.Sorry for the rant as I'm not sure it fits the topic of conversation fully.
64M Cap, Partial Keeper: 4F(ANY) 2D, 2G, Year : H2H Daily 2C/2LW/2RW/1F/4D/2G, 14 Teams
C: Crosby, Malkin Kadri
LW: Yakupov, Moulson
RW: St. Louis, Gaborik
D: Karlsson, Piets Shattenkirk, B.Smith, Franson
G: Rask, Varly, Markstrom, Thomas
Farm (Max 200 GP):
Tarasenko, Kadri, Kuznetsov, Mackinnon, B. Smith, Markstrom, Tatar
FOW(.1) G(4) A(3) PPG(1.5) PPA(1) SHG(3) SHA(2) GWG(1) SOG(.2) +-(1) PIMS(.1) BLK(.2) HIT(.2)
W(6) L(-1) SHO(5) SV(0.1) GA(-0.2) GAA(Range of -1 to 8) SV%(Range of -1 to 8)