Fair offer?

[cizastro]

I'm currently pretty goalie heavy after my latest acquisition of Halak, so I figured I'd trade off a goalie to upgrade my offense a bit. Was thinking about offering the following in a dynasty league (stats in signature)

I give: Varlamov, Giggy, Erat & Korpikoski

I get: Nash, Eberle and Larsson (NJ)

This owner has only one legit goaltender, so getting another one would definitely improve his goalie situation. Am I asking for too much or does that seem fair for a 16-team league?

[bondon]

Even though you have a deep 16 team league you only start 16 goalies.

I think the owner will laugh at you.

Varlamov has been less than stellar this year and losing O'Reilly has hurt the Avs in terms of two way play.

I think this is asking way too much. You'd be lucky to get just Eberle or just Nash IMO. But good luck.

[Kofax]

I think you're asking for far too much and I would not accept that deal.

If I were the other manager, I would start at Nash or Eberle for Varlamov, but there's no way I move both of them.

[Marwin]

This aint going to work. Why 4 goalies when you only start one? Agree with the others Varly for Nash seems fair with this type of setting.

[cizastro]

Thanks, gents!

I didn't want to offend the other manager, I just wasn't sure how to appropriately value a starting goalie in a league where goalies can be scarce. I thought maybe it'd make them more valuable.

I will try and go after Eberle then. Would a Varlamov for Eberle be out of line?

[Marwin]

Thanks, gents!

I didn't want to offend the other manager, I just wasn't sure how to appropriately value a starting goalie in a league where goalies can be scarce. I thought maybe it'd make them more valuable.

I will try and go after Eberle then. Would a Varlamov for Eberle be out of line?

Worth a try I guess. But even if Eberle started the season kind of cold Im pretty shure his owner will hold on to him, since he is young with lots of potential. Good luck.