Reply With QuoteI'd take Conacher. It's a lot closer than you'd think, but I really like Conacher with Stamkos and on that PP.
Both players are being given oodles of ice time, both will be good for years to come.
It's close but I still like CC
Brunner or Conacher?
As a prospect in a points only keeper league. I'm really torn between the two.
Any suggestions would be appreciated!
I'd take Conacher. It's a lot closer than you'd think, but I really like Conacher with Stamkos and on that PP.
Both players are being given oodles of ice time, both will be good for years to come.
It's close but I still like CC
Yeah, the Stamkos factor is what's making me lean on the Conacher side. Martin St. Louis has to retire at some point!
Originally Posted by 9601
loving that conacher is on the stammer line - give me conacher long-term - by a hair - i think he'll be more prone to injury than brunner though.
15-Team keep 6f, 3d, 1g pts-only, wins=2, SO=3, OTL=1
F: Robertson, Thompson, DeBrincat, McCann, Tomasino, Chytil, Brink, Carlsson, Berggren, Guenther
D: Morrissey, Montour, Jiricek, Perbix, LaCombe, Perunovich
G: Talbot, Kuemper, Merzlikins, Kochetkov, Copley
If you need a player for this season I like Brunner better, long term I think Conacher is the better option.
Posting Permissions