Moulson for Seabrook

[leafnation]

This is for the league in my sig and I'd be giving up Moulson. Normally this wouldn't make any sense but our league counts bs and hits. Having Moulson, Kane, Eberle, and Tavares is killing my +- which obviously Seabrook would help with also. I have no doubt this would improve my team but can't help but feel i could get more for Moulson given how hot he is. Thoughts?

[lucifer316]

seabrook is nice for your categories but not at the cost of moulson imo

[leafnation]

any other thoughts? What if I could get Shea Weber in the same league for Moulson

[davidgoodburn]

I don't mind the Seabrook deal. It is maybe a bit steep for Moulson but Seabrook is a plus player in three categories (H, BS, +/-) where you are struggling. Moulson is a plus in two harder to fill categories (G, PPP).

As for Weber, he is probably a better option than Seabrook. I would suspect you could get him and flip him to teh Seabrook owner and get another updgrade somewhere else.