Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Blackhawks/Kings

  1. #1
    MXHockey's Avatar
    MXHockey is offline
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    6,226
    Location
    Orlando
    Rep Power
    50

    Dobber Sports Wizard

    Default Blackhawks/Kings

    Are the Hawks' ever making LA look average.

    I don't understand how a team like LA, with so much offensive talent, plays so conservatively. Granted it won them a cup, but for a team with so much firepower they take few risks..
    Last edited by MXHockey; February 17, 2013 at 5:20 PM.

  2. #2
    The Guvnah's Avatar
    The Guvnah is offline
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    1,101
    Location
    Ontario
    Rep Power
    26

    Dobber Sports Padawan

    Default

    Yep. I didn't get to pay real close attention to the game because I was at a family thing this afternoon, but from what I saw, LA wasn't doing much of anything other than on those two power plays. It doesn't help that every single line on the Blackhawks is clicking... I mean how good does that Kruger-Frolik-Mayers line look?

    10th year Keeper League, Fantrax

    14 teams, H2H, keep 10, daily starts
    G (3), A (2), +/- (1), PIM (0.1), PPP (1), FOW (0.1), FOL (-0.1), BLK (0.5), HAT (3), W (5), SO (3), SV (0.1), GA (-0.5)

    C (3) - Schmaltz (LW, RW), Mercer (RW), Norris (IR), Domi (LW), T. Johnson (RW), Nosek (LW)
    LW (3) - Keller (RW), Hagel, McCann (C), Zacha (LW), Kubalik (RW), N. Foligno (IR)
    RW (3) - Fiala (LW), Vilardi (C), Ehlers (LW), Kakko
    D (4) - Theodore, Orlov, Grzelcyk, T. van Riemsdyk, Clifton, Skjei, Weegar
    Util (1)
    G (1) - Montembault, Allen, Halak



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •