I'm wondering where people's expectations stand for Conacher as well. Mike Richards seems like he has been on the decline, but he's definitely a more proven asset than Conacher at this point. It seems like Conacher's production is very heavily dependent on his linemates, and guys like that are always a risk.
I'd rather have M. Richards, and I believe that Conacher will remain amonst the leaders in rookie scoring, I just believe that Richards will be the better option.
Swap Conacher for Mike Richards?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote