Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Kane for Eriksson/Suter?

  1. #1
    coffee's Avatar
    coffee is offline
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    185
    Rep Power
    0

    Dobber Sports Prodigy

    Default Kane for Eriksson/Suter?

    Kane is red hot, but Eriksson is always underrated and Suter can really improve my blueline. Worth it, or patch my D holes via the waiver wire? I've got another offer of Hartwell and Hodgson for Kane. Only tempted by the Pims since my team is weak there, but not sure I have use for Hodgson inappropriate shallow league.
    Redraft with 1 waiver/week, start 3 at each F position, 5 D, 1 rookie, 2 Goalies.
    Player Cats = G,A,Pts,PIMs,+/-
    Goalie Cats (0.5 each) = W,GAA,S%,SO (0.25)
    C: E.Staal, Duchene, Couture, M.Richards, T. Johnson (R)
    LW: Benn, Nyquist, Marchand, Roussel
    RW: Ovechkin, St. Loius, Purcell, Nichushkin (R)
    D: Byfuglien, Ekman-Larsson, Chara, Campbell, Wideman, Martin
    G: Price, Luongo

  2. #2
    Cadence's Avatar
    Cadence is offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    216
    Rep Power
    0

    Dobber Sports Prodigy

    Default

    No and No.

    Kane is hot yes, but Chicago is damn good. Eriksson is good but Suter has been disappointing and I don't know he can get back on track. The gap between Kane and Eriksson is too big in my opinion.
    12 Team Keeper Yahoo! Points League

    Keep 8 (max 1 goalie)

    3C 3LW 3RW 6D 2G
    Bench: 6 + 2 IR

    G(3), A(2), +/- (1), PIM (0.5), PPP (1), SHP (2), SOG (0.5), FOW (0.05), HIT (0.25), BLK (0.25)

    W (5.5), L (-2.5), GA (-1), SA (0.2), SHO (5)

    Weekly Roster

    C: Giroux/Ott/Stastny
    LW: Steen/Hartnell/Prust
    RW: Lupul/Callahan/Simmonds
    D: Karlsson/Letang/Burns/Green/Bieksa/Beauchemin/Goligoski
    G: Quick/Ward/Bishop/Khudobin
    Bench: Martin/Hornqvist/Ray Whitney/Backlund

  3. #3
    habs7079's Avatar
    habs7079 is offline
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    255
    Rep Power
    4

    Dobber Sports Blue-Chipper

    Default

    Do not take that trade. Eriksson is a steady 70 pts, but won't get you much more. Kane is capable of 90+ pt seasons. He's playing at that level right now and there is no reason to expect him to not maintain it. Suter is going to take time to adjust in MN, he won't repeat his career numbers from last year this season.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •