Probably with those scoring cats. RNH is a point producer but will have very little PIMS and hits. +/- won't be that strong either until Edmonton as a whole gets better defensively.
With my scoring cats, Landeskog would be the proper choice, correct?
(G,A,+/-,PIM,Hits)
[size=1]13 Team Keeper - Hold 10 (1 G max) - Hold salary dictates draft pick forfeited
Scoring Cats (Equally Weighted): G,A,+/-,PIM,Hits,Blks,W,GAA,SV%
Start 9F,5D,2G
F: M.Tkachuk,B.Tkachuk,Svechnikov,Meier,J.Hughes,McTa vish,Jarvis,Johnston, Keller,Tuch,Crouse,Knies
D: Heiskanen,LeTang,Sergachev,Power,Trouba,Provorov,M intyukov
G: Helleybuck,Vasilevskiy,Jarry,Kochetkov
Probably with those scoring cats. RNH is a point producer but will have very little PIMS and hits. +/- won't be that strong either until Edmonton as a whole gets better defensively.
League 1: 16 Teams. 8 Keepers. Weekly H2H
F (Start 6): Barkov, J.Hughes, Zibanejad, E. Kane, Buchnevich, Kopitar, W. Johnston, Trocheck
D (Start 4): Josi, Hamilton, Toews, Hanifin, Pionk, Clarke, Korchinski
G (Start 1): Vasilevskiy, Binnington
Point System
G=2, A=1, D-man G/A=+1, PIM=0.5, +/-=0.5, Shot=0.1, PPG=1, PPA=1
Goalie Points
W=4, S= 0.14, GA=-1, OvertimeW=1, ShootOutW =1, ShutOut=2
League 2: 12 Team Dynasty League - 30 man roster plus 7 farm.
Keep 20 + 7 farm. Weekly H2H Roto. G, A, Shots, Hits, Blocks, PPP, Goalie W, SV%, GAA. Forward Positional Requirements.
G: Landeskog
A: RNH by quite a bit
+/-: Pretty equal
PIM: Landeskog
Hits: Landeskog by a ton
For me it depends on how much weight your categories carry, if all are equal, you may want to side towards Landeskog, but if points carry more weight, then I would rather go with RNH.
More times than not, I would prefer RNH.