View Poll Results: Which goalie would you own in a one year league?

Voters
12. You may not vote on this poll
  • Howard

    4 33.33%
  • Crawford

    3 25.00%
  • Kipper

    1 8.33%
  • Varlamov

    0 0%
  • Hiller

    1 8.33%
  • Anderson

    0 0%
  • Lindback

    0 0%
  • Backstrom

    1 8.33%
  • Pavelec

    0 0%
  • Brodeur

    2 16.67%
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: which goalie would you rather own in a one year league?

  1. #1
    mclarenf1's Avatar
    mclarenf1 is offline
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    2,177
    Rep Power
    21

    Dobber Sports Pro

    Default which goalie would you rather own in a one year league?

    I currently have howard on my team but not sure how well he will do with a lidstromless Detroit team.

    of these goalies, which one would you have, how would you rank them? would you drop howard to pick them up?

    Howard
    Crawford
    Kipper
    Varlamov
    Brodeur
    Backstrom
    Lindback
    Hiller
    Anderson
    Pavelec
    9 team One Year Rotisserie League (Daily Rosters with 82 Max Games Played) 40 move limit
    Cats: G A +/- PIM PPG PPP SHP GWG SOG GWG FW HIT BLK W GAA SV SV% SHO
    3C 2LW 2RW 4D 1UTIL 2G 3BN

    C McDavid Larkin Dubois Schenn Konecny
    LW Panarin Connor Arvidsson Nichushkin
    RW Marner Necas Buchnevich
    D Fox Burns Pietrangelo Durzi
    G Oettinger Samsonov
    IR+ P. Kane

  2. #2
    Rep Power
    50

    Dobber Sports Wizard

    Default

    one year brodeur
     
    6 Team Yahoo H2H Daily Today League
    G, A, +/-, PIM, PPP, GWG
    W, GAA, SV, SV%
    3 C, 3 LW, 3 RW, 3 F, 6 D, 2 G, 5 Bench
    Keep 10 - 6 F, 3 D, 1 G


    14 Team Yahoo H2H Daily Tomorrow League
    G, A, -/+, PIM, PPP, SHP, SOG, FW
    W, GAA, SV, SV%, SHO
    3 C, 3 LW, 3 RW, 5 D, 1 U, 2 G, 5 Bench
    Keep 14 - 2 G Max

  3. #3
    cyyao's Avatar
    cyyao is offline
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    207
    Rep Power
    0

    Dobber Sports Prodigy

    Default

    I am very much of a similar mind with Howard... Detroit hasn't been looking the same this year... but I think that is a combination of a huge loss in leadership on the blueline and a veteran'ish team trying to adapt to a condensed schedule, plus rust for Howard.

    I would say that the high risk - high return would be Hiller or Varlymov, b/c if they actually have that career year, you'll look like a genius! So far Hiller has been looking decent... but I don't know if he can sustain... minus a couple under performing stars... ANA has been better than DET. Varlymov has an unknown factor that goes with COL... they could be stellar but would need to prove themselves significantly more than ANA.

    However, I'm liking Crawford in CHI. His play has been better than Howard so far. He has a better offence in front of him and I think he'll have better stats overall than Howard this year (better D in front IMO).

    If I recall (I may be wrong), but I remember reading that with the reduced schedule, most games will be divisional and within their respective conferences, meaning that if you are emphasizing starts and wins (over GAA, SAV, Sav %), you'd want someone who won't play harder opponents too often... that being said, I would say that the comparison is Howard vs Crawford, Varlymov vs the Canadian teams, and Hiller vs teams who have some stellar G (Quick, Lehtonen, Niemi and Smith - when back)

    Therefore, in a 1 yr, I would take Crawford over Howard to play better as a team against his division (and against teams like DET, CLB, NSH... and the toughest being STL now), Varlymov as a potential X factor in the NW Div and Hiller against some tough competition.
    5 Teams, Start 4 C, 4 RW, 4 LW, 6 D, 2 Util, 2 G, 5 Bench, 1 IR

    1 Year Yahoo, Roto, G/A/+-/PIMS/PPP/SHP/SHA/GWG/SOG/SH%/FW/HIT/BLK,

    W/L/GA/GAA/SA/SV/SV%/ SHO,

    unlimited Trades/Waiver

    C - Malkin (RW), Spezza, H. Sedin, Lecavalier, Bergeron
    LW - Datsyuk (C), Hall, Conacher (C), Perron, Eriksson (RW)
    RW - Tarasenko, Hodgson (C), Heatley (LW), Grabner, Callahan
    D - Weber, Seabrook, Salo, E. Karlsson, Seabrook, Diaz, Markov, Campbell

    G - Crawford, Anderson, Rinne, Lehtonen

  4. #4
    bumchilly25's Avatar
    bumchilly25 is offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    3,407
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Rep Power
    35

    Dobber Sports Expert

    Default

    In a 1 year, I'll go with Crawford. Chi is a top tiered team where if healthy, Crawford will get almost all their starts. That should = LOTS of wins.

    Brodeur will slow down slightly.
    Varly won't get enough wins in Col behind a somewhat suspect D

    Good luck!
    12 -Team Yahoo, Points Pool, Keeper (Since 1995): G(1), A(1), PPG(1), SHG(1) GWG(1), W(2), SHO(3). Protect 13 each season.

    C (4): Hayes, Bonino, White, Bozak
    LW (4): Aho, Huberdeau, K Connor, Gourde
    RW (4): Perry, Boeser, Tuch, Zucker
    F (1):Labanc
    D (4): Barrie, Theodore, Faulk, Shattenkirk
    G (1): Lehner

    Bench: (C) Kerfoot, (RW) Silfverberg, (LW) Bertuzzi (D) Q Hughes, R Murray, D'Angelo (G) Demko, Markstrom,

  5. #5
    Location
    NewB
    Rep Power
    46

    Dobber Sports Star

    Default

    I would hold onto Howard if it was me.
    I still think Detroit is a decent team w/o Lidstrom.
    Weekly H2H points only (Year 9 - 2015-16)
    12 teams limited keeper (keep 6 + 1 Rookie)
    13 round draft - Unlimited Trades - No Waivers - No IR
    4 Team Playoffs (last 2 reg. season weeks)
    Rookies are 23 years old or younger in the draft year and never reached 60pts (forward), 40pts (defense), 25 wins (goalie)


    Start : C RW LW Utility D D G
    Points : A - G = 1 pt W = 2 pts SO = 1pt

    C - S.Stamkos, J.Thornton, K.Turris, D.Stepan
    LW - O.Palat, B.Saad, A.Burakovsky
    RW - B.Wheeler, T.Toffoli, C.Atkinson
    D - E.Karlsson, S.Gostisbehere, C.Fowler, A.Ekblad, A.Larsson
    G - C.Hellebuyck, D.Dubnyk, A.Niemi, K.Lehtonen

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •