Weber or Pietrangelo?

[Sman]

Pietrangelo for me.

[tgraveline]

Man, I'm torn here.

Weber is a stud and will be for a long time. Losing Suter worries me a little about his point production, but everything else he does will stay the same except for maybe his plus minus.

Pietrangelo had a great season, and seriously almost all of his points came from December on. St. Louis is a team where he's the guy like Weber is, but I like his supporting cast even more.

So as much as I like them both, it pains me to take Pietrangelo here as I'm just not as big of a fan, yet.

[SixtyPercentOfTheTime]

In points only, it's Pietrangelo for me as well.

[Chancho]

AP for me as well.

[The Hockey Hitman]

I think you can't go wrong either way...but Weber for me.

[horrorfan]

Who would you rather have in a pts only keeper? Weber or Pietro?

If this is a draft question, it's flip a coin for me and whoever you like best. I can see them both comparable in the coming years. Depending on your roster size I'm not sure the difference will be significant enough.

If this is a trade question, then I would go for the one that costs less to acquire. Or if you are trading one of them, who you can trade for more. Knowing how the other owners value them is important and could maximise the return.

If this is deciding who to keep, then it overlaps the first two points I've mentioned.

[Carcillo]

I'd go with AP. Already at the same level and more upside to improve point production.