Trade offered for my Ovechkin...interest starting to rise.
 

I was just offered Parise/Reimer for Ovie. Not a great offer but I'm looking to win this year and will make what ever moves are needed without morgaging the future.

Edit: he also has P. Kane

I was about to offer another GM a deal using Ovie/Lindback for Rask/Semin...I personally like this deal but I'm not sure the GM would take it. My goalies would dominate the 4 cats.

with only 4 keepers there is no need to trade ovechkin. u have ovy, crosby, sequin, quick. you arent gonna do better than that.

as for win now. doing either of those trades wont really give u the edge if u dont have it already. ovechkin has been producing pretty well as of late. him and ribs are connecting well.

Agreed, what do you think of me going after Karlsson? He could easily become my 4th keeper. It would cost my Ovie but I might be able to get Kessel/Karlsson for Ovie and a fringe forward (I'd need to drop a player anyway to add karlsson)...then he can be placed on IR freeing up a spot.

Keepers would be Sid, Karlsson and 2 of Seguin, Quick, Yakupov and Benn.

Another rejection and another counter offer. This time he offered Parise/Skinner(post concussion) for Ovie...this too was rejected. I asked him to stop offering me injured players...lol

Looking at his squad though there might be something that helps me both now and next season.

My Ovie/McDonald/5th for his Sharp/Reimer/1st...may be asking a little much with the 1st??? I have to send McDonald his way as I'd have to drop a player anyway.

I love Sharp's game.

Edit: Also, there's a GM in desperate need of a goalie. I could always offer Lindback or Reimer to him once Reimer proves himself healthy.

Totally agree with Newp. OV, Crosby, Quick and Seguin.

If you're in a position to win now I wouldn't be trading for Karlsson. It would be nice to have Karlsson no doubt but if you have a chance and judging by your team, you do go for it NOW. Also, if you were to keep Karlsson I'm assuming you wouldn't be keeping a goalie which would be a mistake IMO.