![]() |
Turris or Callahan?
Hi guys, this is for a couple of years down the road. Who do you like in a points only keeper: Turris or Callahan?
|
It's never really for a couple of years down the road unless you are talking about potential superstars. Turris is nice but I don't think he's SOOOOOO good that you'd bother taking him over Callahan. Seems pretty neutral for the future so you should stick with the more productive player currently.
|
I'd stick with proven in Callahan. I don't see Turris scoring more than him.
|
Safe: Callahan, Risk: Turris.
Turris has upside, and I think it's worth the risk. He had some decent streaks last season, and with Nash/Gabby/Richards - I think Callahan's production actually takes a slight hit. |
Callahan over Turris, especially if you have to factor in postion. Turris has a slight potential to out point Callahan, but is much less likely to do so. The chance of Turris out scoring Callahan, is not worth the risk.
|
I'd roll with Callahan as well. As md said, Turris' upside is not worth passing on Callahan.
|
Callahan. I still think he has even more upside, not alot but some. Turris does as well but feel he'll be more inconsistent.
|
I would go with Callahan as well.
I did like what I saw from Turris when he was traded to Ottawa last year, but Spezza is the number one centre and will be for some time. |
Points only, I'm going with Turris. Yes, he's more unproven than Callahan but all Callahan has proven to me is that he'll be a 50-ish point player. I like some risk and with Turris I see someone who can consistently outpoint Callahan, despite being the guy behind Spezza. Turris is riskier but I see him being a 60-point player and I don't see that in Callahan.
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:55 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.